July 21, 2025

Where did RNA come from? Origin-of-life scientists from Scripps Research reveal how the sugar ribose may have been selected as one of life's building blocks.

July 21, 2025

LA JOLLA, CA In living organisms today, complex molecules like RNA and DNA are constructed with the help of enzymes. So how did these molecules form before life (and enzymes) existed? Why did some molecules end up as the building blocks of life and not others? A new study by Scripps Research scientists helps answer these longstanding questions.

The results, published in the chemistry journal Angewandte Chemie on June 27, 2025, show how ribose may have become the sugar of choice for RNA development. They found that ribose binds to phosphate another molecular component of RNA more quickly and effectively than other sugar molecules. This feature could have helped select ribose for inclusion in the molecules of life.

This gives credence to the idea that this type of prebiotic chemistry could have produced the building blocks of RNA, which then could have led to entities which exhibit lifelike properties, says corresponding author Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy, professor of chemistry at Scripps Research.

Nucleotides, the building blocks of RNA and DNA, consist of a five-carbon sugar molecule (ribose or deoxyribose) that is bound to a phosphate group and a nitrogen-based base (the part of the molecule that encodes information, e.g., A, C, G or U). Krishnamurthy's research aims to understand how these complex molecules could have arisen on primordial Earth. Specifically, this study focused on phosphorylation, the step within nucleotide-building where ribose connects to the phosphate group.

Phosphorylation is one of the basic chemistries of life; it's essential for structure, function and metabolism, says Krishnamurthy. We wanted to know, could phosphorylation also play a fundamental role in the primordial process that got all of these things started?

From previous work, the team knew that ribose could become phosphorylated when combined with a phosphate-donating molecule called diamidophosphate (DAP). In this study, they wanted to know whether other, similar sugars could also undergo this reaction, or whether there is something special about ribose.

To test this, the researchers used controlled chemical reactions to investigate how quickly and effectively ribose is phosphorylated by DAP compared to three other sugar molecules with the same chemical makeup but a different shape (arabinose, lyxose and xylose). Then, they used an analytical technique called nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to characterize the molecules produced by each reaction.

They showed that although DAP was able to phosphorylate all four sugars, it phosphorylated ribose at a much faster rate. Additionally, the reaction with ribose resulted exclusively in ring-shaped structures with five corners (e.g., 5-member rings), whereas the other sugars formed a combination of 5- and 6-member rings.

This really showed us that there is a difference between ribose and the three other sugars, says Krishnamurthy. Ribose not only reacts faster than the other sugars, its also more selective for the five-member ring form, which happens to be the form that we see in RNA and DNA today.

When they added DAP to a solution containing equal amounts of the four different sugars, it preferentially phosphorylated ribose. And whereas the other three sugars got stuck at an intermediate point in the reaction, a large proportion of the ribose molecules were converted into a form that could likely react with a nuclear base to form a nucleotide.

What we got was a 2-in-1: We showed that ribose is selectively phosphorylated from a mixture of sugars, and we also showed that this selective process produces a molecule with a form that is conducive for making RNA, says Krishnamurthy. That was a bonus. We did not anticipate that the reaction would pause at the stage advantageous for producing nucleotides.

The researchers caution that, even if these reactions can all occur abiotically, it doesn't mean that they are the reactions that necessarily resulted in life.

Studying these types of chemistries helps us understand what sort of processes might have led to the molecules that constitute life today, but we are not making the claim that this selection is what led to RNA and DNA, because that's quite a leap, says Krishnamurthy. There are a lot of other things that need to happen before you get to RNA, but this is a good start.

In future research, the team plans to test whether this chemical reaction can occur inside primitive cellular structures called protocells.

The next question is, can ribose be selectively enriched within a protocell, and can it further react to make nucleotides within a protocell? says Krishnamurthy. If we can make that happen, it might produce enough tension to force the protocell to grow and divide which is exactly what underpins how we grow.

In addition to Krishnamurthy, the study Selection of Ribofuranose-Isomer Among Pentoses by Phosphorylation with Diamidophosphate was co-authored by Harold A. Cruz of Scripps Research.

The work was supported by the NASA Astrobiology Exobiology grant (80NSSC22K0509).

Chemistry Krishnamurthy, Ramanarayanan

LINK:	https://www.scripps.edu/news-and-events/press-room/2025/20250721-krish...
	See more stories from scripps

North America Stories