One for Me / One for em: Nicole Kidman

Lets take a look at how the Stoker star is balancing the commercial and creative in her career.

One for Me / One for Them: Nicole Kidman

For a movie star who has made their mark, the "One for Me, One for Them" strategy is a good way of maintaining ones career path. By taking "one for them," i.e. commercial pictures that pay well even if theyre not hugely artistic, they can give themselves the freedom and clout to take "one for me," i.e. more creatively challenging/daring projects.

Nicole Kidman didnt invent this strategy, but shes been operating under it, more or less, for almost two decades, with varying degrees of success. Not to get too arbitrary about it, but 1995 is a good year to place the strategys starting point. That year, she won a Golden Globe for Gus Van Sants darkest of dark comedies, To Die For she also took a featured role in that summers giant blockbuster, Batman Forever. From there, Kidman would go on to strike a sometimes-pristine, sometimes-volatile balance between commercial and artistic.

1996 - 1999

To Die For and Batman Forever set Kidman on two paths. After Van Sant, Kidman clearly got a taste for the auteur, and she would soon work with Jane Campion on her follow-up to The Piano, The Portrait of a Lady. And, famously, she and her then-husband Tom Cruise teamed up on Stanley Kubricks final film, Eyes Wide Shut. She earned critical raves for both. At the same time, Kidman became a box-office presence, doing the geopolitical adventure-thriller thing with George Clooney in The Peacemaker, as well as teaming with Sandra Bullock as sisters/witches/big fans of that "lime in the coconut" song in Practical Magic. It was a close balance at the time, but the best-case scenario for the "One for Me..." strategy is that the artsy picks end up enduring longer than the paycheck movies; Kidman achieved that in this year. Advantage: HER

2001 - 2003

This three-year period saw Kidman cresting atop a wave that few Hollywood stars get to ride: one where her "for me" projects brought her "for them" levels of success and notoriety. Moulin Rouge!, Baz Luhrmanns auteurist vision of a glitzy pop musical, earned Kidman her first Oscar nomination. The Others was a late-summer supernatural chiller but was so well-reviewed that Kidman got awards for that performance as well. The Hours was almost unfathomably successful for a talky, cross-generational story featuring lesbians, depressed women, and literature. Kidman won the Oscar. She parlayed all that mainstream art success into a lead role in Lars Von Triers Dogville. That one obviously didnt cross over into commercial success, but if she was going to use her hard-won capital to take real chances, she could hardly have chosen better than Dogville. The hot streak came to a close by the end of 2003, when Cold Mountain was not the Oscar-bait crossover it was expected to be, and The Human Stain was an arthouse flop. Still, there was a while there where she didnt miss a step. Advantage: HER

2004

It was back to the more classic Me/Them dynamic in 2004. Jonathan Glazers Birth was quite well-reviewed but not widely seen nor awarded. The Stepford Wives was neither well-reviewed nor (by the standards of a major studio release) widely seen. Still, since the weight of Stepford did more to tarnish Kidmans career than Birth did to help it ... Advantage: THEM

2005 - 2006

Another rough couple years. Studio efforts The Interpreter (a fine if forgettable teaming with Sean Penn) and Bewitched (an all-around disaster) were only offset by the arthouse misfire Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus. Advantage: THEM

2007

The studio movies didnt get much better in 2007. The Invasion was instantly forgettable low-effort horror-ish-ness, while The Golden Compass was a non-starter of a post-Lord of the Rings franchise. The bright side? Kidmans art-movie concession that year was Noah Baumbachs biting Margot at the Wedding. Nobody saw it, but Kidman was fabulous. Still ... Advantage: THEM

2008 - 2009

An ill-fated attempt to recapture that "have your cake at eat it too" zeitgeist of the early 2000s. You cant blame her for wanting to reunite with Baz Luhrmann again, but Australia made a lot of noise leading up to its release and then went nowhere. Similarly, Nine was heralded as the second coming of Rob Marshalls Oscar-winning Chicago, but it was a snooze, and Kidman ended up getting lost in a gaggle of fellow Oscar winners like Penelope Cruz and Judi Dench. Still, one got the sense that Kidman was at least making the movies she wanted to make. Advantage: HER

2010-2012

Kidman has largely settled back into trade-off mode, getting paid for Adam Sandler garbage like Just Go With It so she can take risks with stuff like Lee Danielss The Paperboy or -- to use a much more high-quality example -- John Cameron Mitchells Rabbit Hole, for which she received her third Oscar nomination. Advantage: HER

2013

Well, shes starting the year off on the auteur tip, reveling in the muck of Park Chan-wooks English-language debut, Stoker. It remains to be seen how commercial Grace of Monaco will be, but with the Weinstein Company behind it, the skys the limit. Advantage: ???

More from Tribeca:

One for Me / One for Them: Rachel Weisz

--

LINK:	http://tribecafilm.com/features/513771661c7d76c7dd00000f-one-for-me-on...
	See more stories from tribecafilm

Most recent headlines