8 Questions to Determine Which Escrow Agreement is Right for You by Nadine Dias

Welcome to the first of many Q&A type blog posts from the Intellectual Property Management group here at Iron Mountain!

Now you can hear firsthand from our experts in IPM about issues and processes I think are most important to you all based on your comments and our most popular blog pages. Feel free to add in any additional questions in the comment section if we don't cover them in the blog post itself.

Today I sat down with John Trotti, our contracts expert, to discuss the difference between a Three Party Escrow Agreement and the Master Three Party Agreements for both Developers and Licensees.

1. What are the major differences between a Three Party and a Master Three Party Agreement?

A Three Party agreement is signed by the escrow agent, the developer (depositor), and the licensee (beneficiary). The agreement only supports one escrow account and no additional parties may be enrolled into the account. Master Agreements come in 2 varieties: the Master Beneficiary Agreement and the Master Depositor Agreement.

The Master Beneficiary Agreement is an agreement between the escrow agent and the licensee. The licensee may enroll developers into the agreement using an enrollment form. The enrollment form is signed by all of the parties and incorporates the terms of the master agreement as decided on between the parties. In effect, each enrollment becomes a separate agreement between all 3 parties. Under the Master Beneficiary Agreement, each enrollment of a developer creates a new escrow account so that each developer's escrow materials is maintained separately.

The Master Depositor Agreement is very similar to the Master Beneficiary Agreement, but there are some important differences. Under a Master Depositor Agreement, the developer and the escrow agent sign a master agreement. Licensees may be enrolled into the account using an enrollment signed by all of the parties which incorporated the terms of the master agreement. In contrast to the Master Beneficiary Agreement, multiple licensees can be added to the same escrow account. This is a big practical benefit to a developer because they can put one set of materials in escrow and support multiple licensees. In addition, the Master Depositor Agreement can support multiple escrow accounts. What this means is that a developer has 3 suites of products. A Master Depositor Agreement would allow the developer to set up 3 corresponding accounts and enroll licensees into each account as needed.

2. What are the benefits of using a Master agreement as a developer and as a licensee?

For both developers and licensees, the main advantage is that the master party has an opportunity to pre-negotiate the terms to meet their legal and business needs. In practice, the enrollments into master agreements typically have much less negotiation and review than a 3 Party Agreement so that can help streamline deal closure. In many cases, the enrollment is simply signed by all of the parties without any negotiation. Also, in aggregate the fees for the Master Agreement are cheaper than for multiple 3 Party Agreements.

From a strictly developer perspective, one of the big advantages of the Master Agreement is its flexibility and scalability. The Master Agreement, as mentioned, can support multiple escrow accounts which correspond to product suites of custom code. In addition, one account can support multiple enrollees so it's less burdensome for the developer to support their escrow obligations. For instance one set of material in an escrow account could support 5 enrollees rather than the developer having to submit 5 sets of duplicate materials to support the same number of licensees.

From a strictly licensee perspective, the major advantage of the Master Agreement is that it is scalable across any organization. The typical master beneficiary is a larger or growing company and it can be difficult to manage software acquisition in such an environment. Obtaining a signature for enrollment into the Master Beneficiary Agreement is a relatively easy action item compares to a negotiation of a separate 3 Party escrow agreement. The escrow enroLlment can be added to procurement or IT checklist to help ensure internal compliance with risk mitigation procedures.

3. What is the best approach to negotiate the terms in my Master Agreement?

Master agreements can remain in effect for years so it's important to keep the terms of the Master Agreement general and avoid specific references to licenses or license provisions that may change over time of from enrollee to enrollee.

During the enrollment process there is an opportunity to make some adjustments to include appropriate references or other terms (see next question). The other thing to bear in mind is that while the master should reflect the master party's legal and business needs, the agreement shouldn't become too one-sided. Aside from potentially poisoning the trust between the licensee and the developer in the final stages of closing the licensing deal, a one-sided master could trigger requests for significant edits or a stand-alone 3 Party Agreement which defeats the primary benefit of the Master 3 Party.

4. Can I modify my Master Agreement for Individual Developers or Licensees?

The Master agreement should be kept as general as possible to preserve its flexibility (as mentioned above). However, the terms of the Master Agreement may be amended to add to a particular party in the enrollment. Remember that the enrollment creates a separate agreement between all 3 parties that incorporate the terms of the underlying Master Agreement. It's a fairly straight forward process to incorporate select amendments within the enrollment form. Common edits include changes to the release provisions to align them with the license agreement and sometimes choice of law or dispute provisions.

5. If I am a

LINK:	http://blogs.ironmountain.com/2015/service-lines/technology-escrow/8-q...
	See more stories from ironmountain

Most recent headlines