Goodbye Film. Hello ENG.

In the beginning there was film, the format that ruled the world of television news in the 1950s and 60s. It was news film that captured the Civil Rights movement, the Kennedy assassinations and the war in Vietnam. But in the mid-1970s, television news experienced an electronic revolution called ENG, or Electronic News Gathering. This is the story of news film and ENG and how WRAL-TV made the transition.

Photographer Bob Sadler shooting with a Bell & Howell film camera.

WRAL-TV news photographers used 16 mm film cameras that were fairly lightweight. That asset alone enabled them to be nimble and quick out in the field. But getting the footage on the air was a laborious, tedious, time consuming process involving several steps.

First, there was the film run, with the term run referring to the film running through developing solution in the film processing machine. There was an as-needed run available mid-morning for film shot for the noon newscast. The first scheduled run was 1:00 PM. The second scheduled run, the big one, was 3:00 PM for the 6:00 o'clock newscast. A special run was available between 4-6 PM for film footage less than 100 feet.

News crews beat feet back to the station for the 3:00 PM deadline. There was no fudging that time; it was a drop dead deadline. Photographers would drop their film into a box located outside the dark room, and then knock on the door to alert the person assigned to processing.

There were three people in charge of film processing, which was akin to being a chemist; Billy Messer, Rich Raynor, and Jack Edwards. One of the three would be on duty. The film from each photographer's camera would be unloaded from the canister, labeled, stapled to clear leader, and then attached one after another, creating a large reel. You can imagine the immense responsibility on the shoulders of these people; one screw-up would wipe out a full day of work with nothing to show during the newscast! Meanwhile, photographers were chomping at the bit to retrieve their processed film so they could start editing.

The Houston Fearless color film processor.

The color film processor had the persona of a mythological beast. The name of the manufacturer, Houston Fearless, certainly put one on notice. It sucked down solution from seven tanks of film developing chemicals. Bearings, rollers, pumps ingested the film through various stages of development and then spewed it out the other end to the film dryer. The whole process took 30 minutes. Then, the person in charge of processing took down the big reel of film clips and separated them out and returned them to the photographers for editing, which was another laborious, time consuming step.

Film edit work station

The photographer's edit-bench consisted of a supply reel of film that was fed through a viewer and splicing block, where the film was literally cut/spliced and then hot glued together, and then fed to the take-up reel. That finished piece was then added, according to the order in which it was scheduled to air during the newscast, to the A roll reel along with the other stories. The reel would finally make its way to the projection room where it was loaded onto a film projector.

Projectionist Earll Thompson in the projection room.

There were a myriad of things that could, and did occasionally go wrong, but you get the picture; film was a very linear, time consuming process and expensive. Film could not be reused, and the Houston Fearless needed constant upkeep. Plus, there were only three people in the station who were schooled in the art of film development.

By 1975, television technology started to change and the hand-writing was on the wall. Portable, hand-held, electronic cameras using video-tube technology invaded television newsrooms. The old 16mm film era was coming to an end, replaced by portable video-or ENG.

News photographer Jack Edwards using the Sony DXC1600P.

The first ENG camera used at WRAL was a Sony DXC1600P. Take a look at the picture of Jack Edwards wielding one in the picture. After consulting with Mike Upchurch, long time WRAL engineer, we believe the backpack that Jack is wearing probably holds the camera control unit (CCU), and batteries. The recorder was a VO-3800 and was very heavy. In fact, Mike said he does not recall seeing it used as a shoulder deck. He also added the camera produced terrible video. I was glad to see it go!

Bob Sadler, retired WRAL photographer, recalled the primitive attempts at video editing before the arrival of inch editing controllers, and playback and record machines. The first stories that I edited when WRAL bought its first video camera was me and Paul Pope standing in front of a quad machine in the basement. There was no way to synchronize edits on those machines so we figured out how long it took for my field recorder to get up to speed, say 3 sec. and Paul would back up the quad machine say 10 sec. and hit play and we would count down 10-9-8 (it was kind of like NASA launching the space shuttle) and at 3 seconds I would hit play on the field recorder and when we got to 0 Paul would hit the record button. Amazingly enough it worked, well most of the time.

News photographer Willis Boyd using the Ikegami HL-77 and separate recorder.

The Ikegami HL-77 became the news camera of choice for WRAL. By-the-way, HL did not reference a high tech term; HL stood for Handy-Looky in Japanese. The camera weighed about twenty pounds. Fold in the weight of a bulky recorder and all the ancillary items, a photog could find him or herself schlepping a total of about 40 pounds of gear. The cost of the camera body alone was about $50,000. Add the necessary lens, batteries, recorder and other accessories, the price climbed higher. However, even with the cost of the camera, the economic edge went to the video camera. The tapes could be erased a

LINK:	http://www.capitolbroadcasting.com/2015/03/12/goodbye-film-hello-eng/...
	See more stories from cbc

Most recent headlines