Live From FIFA World Cup: FIFA's Florin Mitu on the Evolution of World Cup Coverage This year's production is enhanced by IP, hybrid UHD/HDR, AR, and other new tech By Ken Kerschbaumer, Editorial Director Sunday, December 4, 2022 - 10:11 am
Print This Story
Florin Mitu is head of broadcast production for the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar, and this year's effort has been years in the making. And, although the COVID pandemic and the global supply- chain crisis impacted efforts, innovations like a move to IP, new workflows in UHD and HDR, and additional broadcast enhancements have lifted the quality of the viewing experience. Midway through the tournament, Mitu sat down with SVG at the IBC to discuss the efforts.
What have been your general impressions of how the World Cup has played out?
It's an extremely well-organized event on all fronts, and we are very grateful for those who have worked over the last 12 years to put this in place. The stadiums, as you probably have seen, are fantastic. The facilities here at the QNCC [where the IBC is located] are great and unique. I don't know whether you've been already to the presentation facilities at the Souq Waqif, but we benefit from a great location, which is the location that all broadcasters wanted.
As an extension to that, we have also the presentation platforms with the views of the skyline and the Corniche. We spent quite a long time trying to find the best spot to showcase the host country to the viewers of the world.
FIFA's Florin Mitu: I think the achievements here are some that will make everybody proud at the end of the tournament.
There have been a lot of technology enhancements and evolution. There's the move to IP; there's the move to UHD, HDR. What are some of your takeaways, some lessons so far, regarding some of those transitions?
With the move to IP, when you look back at 2018, we were not yet making full use of it. Shortly after that, we decided to go that route for 2022. Then what happened, with COVID on a global scale, the use of IP and remote was accelerated.
It was still a key decision for us to take, and we had to look at it very carefully. We had to decide whether that made sense in terms of a full-scale remote production for this tournament or not. We weighed the risks and the advantages and then decided against a complete remote production.
That said, we have increased the scope of remote here. The multi-feeds at the IBC that used to be produced at galleries at the venues are all now being done in dedicated galleries at the IBC. That was our first step in this direction.
In the future, there will be more steps in this direction, which I can't disclose at this point in time, but there's something very exciting in the pipeline.
IP is still in relatively early days, and there are still some things to be sorted out. What are your thoughts on where IP is in terms of maturity?
For technical providers, I think it's a matter of getting more experience in using it, getting more training of staff, and getting to know the capabilities of the technology and software better. There's still a certain element of learning that is happening here.
That's one of the main challenges that our host broadcaster had to fix.
How has the UHD/HDR 12-gig service been received by rightsholders?
We have 24 takers, which is great. It's the same as in Russia [site of World Cup 2018], but now we are distributing it onsite. It's an evolution from the Russian model, which, as you may remember, we had a dedicated main camera, which was used for the UHD feed. Here, there's one hybrid UHD/HD model because you can't find so many native UHD cameras in the whole world.
We then decided together with HBS to go for the wide-shot cameras in UHD and the close-up and the super-slo-mo [cameras] in 1080p. It's working great, and we're very happy with that.
We also haven't received any complaints so far. In 2018, on the broadcaster side, there was still a struggle to understand precisely the HDR workflows and the various flavors and how they applied to your production chain and so on. Now it's very smooth.
How would you describe the FIFA/HBS LUT for HDR? I know each one has its own characteristics, such as either going for being more realistic or being more vivid.
I think it's both of that: a more realistic look and different colors. But, yes, we created our own LUT for this tournament, and we are very happy with how it looks and how it improves the viewers' experience. That comes together with the immersive sound, of course.
When you look at the production plan for the matches here, from a production perspective, is there anything you think is still missing?
To be honest, look at what happened here. Camera-wise, where do you go beyond 42? I mean, yes, you can add more cameras, but you are seeing pretty much everything that's happening down on the field.
The route we were very excited to take was to integrate some of the work our colleagues from other divisions in FIFA do - such as the High Performance Team, led by Chief of Global Football Development Ars ne Wenger, as well as the Football Technology and Innovations Team - and try to improve the viewers' experience and understanding of the game by incorporating some of their tools.
Therefore, we have introduced, for the first time ever, Enhanced Football Intelligence statistics. They come on augmented reality before the match, halftime, after the match, and then as lower thirds during the match. That has never been done before.
We have a connected ball that sends data to a central server here. That data is used, for instance, to calculate the speed of the ball. We now have that, which only seems natural.
But you need to have the tools to do it, and the chip in the ball helps us to do th
