NAB 2019 Reflections: Intelsat's Bill O'Hara on IronRoute and the Benefits of Blended Connectivity

NAB 2019 Reflections: Intelsat's Bill O'Hara on IronRoute and the Benefits of Blended Connectivity Combining the cloud with broadband, cellular, and satellite enhances reliability By Jason Dachman, Chief Editor

Wednesday, April 24, 2019 - 1:20 pm

Print This Story

Story Highlights

Intelsat arrived at NAB 2019 with major announcements, including the launch of IronRoute in partnership with Dejero. The blended connectivity and cloud-based content-distribution solution for media delivers reliable connectivity by blending broadband, cellular (3G, 4G, 5G), and satellite connectivity from Intelsat's global network. Intelsat also announced a new partnership with Aldea to expand satellite and fiber video-contribution and -distribution networks for media customers globally and use both companies' extensive presence in Latin America.

SVG sat down with Intelsat GM, Media, Bill O'Hara to discuss the new IronRoute platform, why Intelsat is pursuing blended-connectivity solutions and how he sees them changing the industry, the benefits of the Aldea partnership, and how at-home production is exploding.

Intelsat's Bill O'Hara: [At-home] is exploding right now. And what does that explosion rely on? Connectivity. We need to be looking at ways that satellite can make a play in this connectivity portfolio.

Tell us about the new IronRoute platform Intelsat is launching here at NAB.

In partnership with Dejero, we're launching a service called IronRoute for media. This service is creating an end-to-end managed video-distribution or -contribution platform for occasional use or full-time services. The way it works is that the cloud is managing connectivity at the origination point and the distribution point through our partnership with Dejero and Intelsat satellite connectivity.

As an example, you could have potentially fixed broadband, consumer-grade public internet at the content-origination point, and we would be aggregating that with cellular and/or satellite on top. You would utilize the cellular or satellite only if that consumer-grade public internet started degrading or experiencing packet loss or latency. The cloud is managing all of that by looking at the connections at each location every 150 ms and determining what is the right blend of connectivity for this video to go from the origination point into the cloud.

Then, once it's in the cloud, it's doing the same thing, looking at all the destination points and determining the right blend of connectivity to get it through that last mile all the way to the endpoint. And, at each one of these locations, we would expect there to be a diverse blend of connectivity from consumer-grade public internet, cellular, and satellite.

Through our global satellite footprint, we're extending the reach of this into regions where terrestrial connectivity can be challenging. If you can grab a little bit of cellular or fixed broadband, you can put that into the connectivity stack and supplement it with satellite to create an aggregated pipe.

What are the primary differences or additional features between IronRoute and the CellSat service that Intelsat and Dejero launched a few years ago?

There are two major additional features in IronRoute compared to CellSat.

One is continuing to add additional connectivity to the overall portfolio. CellSat focused on combining cellular and satellite. This adds a third leg, if you will, of terrestrial public internet. That also, by the way, tends to make the overall throughput capability significantly higher. We have potential services that we're demoing right now that have as high as 90-Mbps [throughput].

The second big difference is, CellSat was designed more for contribution, while IronRoute is full-duplex. The place where the content is originating could also be receiving. Think of a mesh network where you have 20 locations trying to send video back and forth to each other. Instead of doing that via MPLS or a managed fiber service, we strongly believe that utilizing the blend of connectivity at each of those locations -for both sending and receiving - creates tremendous value. These locations are essentially agnostic in terms of whether they are sending or receiving content. IronRoute provides end-to-end management of the first mile or the last mile, depending on if you're sending or receiving.

We think that this is going to have tremendous application for occasional use, [for] locations that sporting events go back to over and over again. You can put some fixed infrastructure there and then utilize IronRoute as an aggregated pipe for REMI [remote-integration] feeds or anything that might require higher throughputs.

We also see it as good fit for full-time services - those that have [installed] MPLS circuits at 20 or even a hundred locations. With IronRoute, the cloud would be in the middle, looking every 150 ms at each one of these endpoints and managing the best blend of connectivity.

How can users customize their connectivity with IronRoute depending on their specific needs?

IronRoute isn't about either/or; it's about creating the best combination according to the business rules that the customer has set. You can customize what you need at each location. For example, a broadcaster has 200 total locations, and 20 of them are already on fiber. Our value prompt for those 20 is, let's introduce a bulletproof network that utilizes broadband, cellular, and satellite, and that satellite is available to be dropped in dynamically at each of those 20 locations. What about the other 180 locations that it hasn't been cost-effective to extend fiber to? We can create a system that the customer tailors so that locations 95-120 have broadband and cellular and satellite but the peak amount of burstable satellite is 5 megs. We can do that with what we call shapi

LINK:	https://www.sportsvideo.org/2019/04/24/nab-2019-reflections-intelsats-...
	See more stories from svg

Most recent headlines