Debate on same-sex marriage: Japan court rules ban constitutional

Debate on same-sex marriage: Japan court rules ban constitutionalSame-sex marriage becomes a debatable topic in Japan as it is the only G7 nation that considers its ban constitutional and not violation

by Agence France-Presse

21-06-2022 07:30

in LGBTQIA+

Same-sex couple Sandy Stier (C) and Kriss Perry (R) are married at San Francisco City Hall by California Attorney General Kamala Harris on 28 June, 2013 in San Francisco, California. The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals lifted California's ban on same-sex marriages just three days after the Supreme Court ruled that supporters of the ban, Proposition 8, could not defend it before the high court. California Gov. Jerry Brown ordered all counties in the state to begin issuing licenses immediately. Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

A Japanese court ruled on Monday that the country's failure to recognise same-sex marriage is constitutional, in a setback for activists after a landmark verdict last year found the opposite.

--

The district court in western Japan's Osaka rejected arguments made by three same-sex couples as part of a series of suits filed by activists seeking marriage equality.

From the perspective of individual dignity, it can be said that it is necessary to realise the benefits of same-sex couples being publicly recognised through official recognition,

the court ruling said. ALSO READ: China's Covid-19 mass testing mantra bursts bins with medical waste'

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE But the present failure to recognise such unions is not considered to violate the constitution , the ruling added, saying public debate on what kind of system is appropriate for this has not been thoroughly carried out .

--

Akiyoshi Miwa, the lawyer representing the plaintiffs in the case, said he was shocked by the court's unwillingness to intervene in the debate.

It means the judge is saying the court doesn't have to actively get involved in human rights issues,

Miwa said. she couldn't believe the ruling .

Plaintiff Machi Sakata who got married to her American partner in the US state of Oregon said The court also ruled that if a framework similar to marriage was created then same-sex partners could receive legal benefits.

Nothing can replace (marriage). I feel nothing but resentment. It's like they're saying, We don't treat you equally but that's OK, right?',

said Sakata. ALSO READ: Taiwan's gay marriage ruling raises hopes across Asia

--

SAME-SEX PARTNERSHIPS Monday's verdict comes after a district court in northern Sapporo last year found the opposite, ruling that the government's failure to allow same-sex marriage violated the constitution's provision guaranteeing equality under the law.

That ruling was welcomed by campaigners as a major victory that would pile pressure on lawmakers to accept same-sex unions.

Japan's constitution stipulates that marriage shall be only with the mutual consent of both sexes .

But in recent years, local authorities across the country have made moves to recognise same-sex partnerships, although such recognition does not carry the same rights as marriage under the law.

The prefecture of Tokyo last month said it would begin recognising same-sex partnerships from November, revising current rules.

More than a dozen couples filed suits seeking marriage equality in 2020 in district courts across Japan. They said the coordinated action was intended to put pressure on the only G7 government that does not recognise gay unions.

Agence France-Presse

UCT Online High School gives your child better quality education in the comfort of your home. READ MORE!

LINK:	https://www.thesouthafrican.com/culture/lgbtqia/debate-on-same-sex-mar...
	See more stories from thesouthafrican

Most recent headlines