Well-Thought-Out UX: The Quiet Power Behind Our Latest Improvements

AI should balance automation (replacing tasks) and augmentation (empowering humans). Automate the mundane and augment the creative by applying the right AI type to unlock human potential.

AI is fundamentally changing the game, but at Codemill, its not just about flashy new tech-its about smart solutions. We see a clear distinction between automation and augmentation, and we believe that the most powerful applications are a perfect mix of both. But what exactly are the differences between them?

Automation vs. AugmentationAutomation is about using AI to take over tasks entirely. Think of it as a super-efficient robot following a detailed checklist. It's perfect for repetitive, high-volume tasks where consistency is key. For instance:

If a new file version is ingested Give the file a new version number

If a file is missing metadata Reject it automatically

Automation reduces errors, saves time, and lets your team focus on more strategic work. It's the behind-the-scenes hero that keeps things running smoothly.

Augmentation is a bit different. Instead of replacing a human, it empowers them. It's like giving your team a brilliant assistant that helps with research, flags potential issues, or provides creative ideas. AI enhances human creativity and decision-making, leading to better outcomes. Its a partnership between human and machine, where the AIs strengths (speed, data processing) complement the humans strengths (critical thinking, emotional intelligence).

The greatest value is created when you strike the right balance between the two. By automating the mundane and augmenting the creative, we can build a future where technology makes us more efficient and empowered.

Of course, before you can choose between automation and augmentation, you have to understand what you're trying to solve with the AI, as we showed in our previous article, and then select the right technology for the job. Just like you wouldnt use a microphone to capture an image, understanding the different types of AI is crucial to ensuring youre using the right technology to achieve your goals.

Three Types of AIThink of AI as a family with different personalities and skill sets. Each one brings something unique to the table, and they often work together to solve complex problems!

Rule-based AI: The Stickler for RulesThis is the oldest member of the AI family and it is the ultimate rule-follower. It operates on a set of pre-defined "if-then" rules created by a human. Think of a simple spam filter:

"IF an email contains the phrase free money, THEN send it to the junk folder."

Its great for predictable, repetitive tasks, but it cant learn or think outside the box. Its the dependable, no-nonsense one who always follows the recipe to the letter.

Traditional AI: The Expert AnalystThis type of AI is more sophisticated and often uses machine learning to find patterns in large amounts of labeled data. It can make predictions or classify information based on what it has learned. Its the AI that recommends your next favorite movie on a streaming service based on your viewing history. This AI is all about analysis and classification-it can tell you what something is but cant create anything new. Its the smart, observant one who can predict what youll want before you even know it.

Generative AI: The Creative GeniusThis is the rising star that everyones talking about! Generative AI uses vast, unsupervised datasets to learn patterns and then create entirely new content, from text and images to music and code. It doesnt just follow rules or classify data; it invents. When you type a prompt and a large language model writes a story for you, thats Generative AI in action. Its the wild, creative one who can paint a masterpiece or write a poem from a single prompt.

With this understanding of the different types of AI and how to choose the right one for your specific problem, the next step is to determine the ideal level of automation and augmentation for your application.

Balancing AugmentationAutomation might be easy to understand, but what about balancing the augmentation? Its easy to see the benefits of augmentation, but getting the balance just right can be tricky. Codemill's product, Accurate.Video Validate, lets users mark up video content with descriptive or QC related metadata. Marking up the video can be 100% automated or 100% manual work.

100% automation: Timelines in Validate containing autogenerated markers

100% manual work: The create marker form in A.V Validate

Finding the ideal balance between automation and augmentation isnt just theoretical-its something we actively explore in our products. Lets look at a few examples from Accurate.Video Validate, on how some tasks could be balanced.



Example 1 - Ad-breaks

The task is to mark up where the ad-breaks should be placed in a show for linear tv. Of course this could be 100% automated, but could be augmented by:



1. AI creates the ad-breaks, and a person verifies/edits.

2. AI creates the ad-breaks, and a person approves/rejects them. Rejected ad-breaks are replaced with manually created ones.

3. AI creates multiple suggestions for ad-breaks with different placements, a person selects which ones to keep.

4. AI marks up longer durations in the video where an ad-break could be placed, but a person creates all ad-breaks manually

Example 2 - Intro/Outro mark-up

The task is to mark up parts of the video, e.g. intro & outro, to be able to add skip and next buttons in the UI of a streaming service. This could be 100% automated by an AI, but could also be augmented by:

1. AI creates the markers, and a person verifies/edits.

2. AI creates the markers, and a person approves/rejects them. Rejected markers are replaced with manually created markers.

3. AI gives suggestions in the video where the buttons could be placed, but

LINK:	https://www.codemill.se/post/should-we-automate-or-augment-ai...
	See more stories from cantemo

Most recent headlines